NEWS
A Nation’s Shame: The Tragic Failure to Protect Sara Sharif

The tragic death of Sara Sharif has once again drawn attention to the deep flaws in the child protection system. At just 10 years old, Sara lost her life at the hands of her father and stepmother. This case has raised painful questions about how a system meant to safeguard children continues to fail so profoundly. Despite decades of inquiries, strategies, and reforms, the mechanisms in place to protect vulnerable children often fall short. Sara’s death has become a symbol of these repeated failures, leaving many wondering what, if anything, will change.
The outcry over Sara’s death has been swift and emotional. Rachel de Souza, the children’s commissioner for England, called for immediate action, stating: “We can have no more reviews, no more strategies, no more debate. When we say ‘never again,’ we have to mean it—let that be Sara’s legacy.” While this sentiment reflects the frustration and heartbreak many feel, some argue that it oversimplifies a deeply complex issue. Child protection is not a problem that can be solved through slogans or quick fixes. It demands continuous assessment, debate, and adaptation.
Experts in child welfare have expressed doubts about the effectiveness of such calls to action. Dr. David Saltiel, a former social worker and educator, has seen the system struggle with similar tragedies over the years. He recalls other high-profile cases, such as the deaths of Arthur Labinjo-Hughes and Star Hobson, which also prompted declarations of “never again.” Yet, years later, children like Sara continue to fall through the cracks. Dr. Saltiel argues that child protection work is inherently complex, and mistakes are inevitable. The key, he says, is to treat decisions as provisional, always open to change as new evidence emerges. Without this approach, the system risks becoming rigid and unresponsive.
One of the significant issues highlighted in Sara’s case is the lack of a robust system for sharing information among professionals. Social workers, teachers, and healthcare providers often struggle to access the data they need to make informed decisions. The children’s commissioner has proposed an integrated system that would allow professionals to share information efficiently and assign each child a reference number for identification. This proposal echoes an earlier system called ContactPoint, which was created in the wake of the 2004 Children Act. That legislation was itself a response to the death of Victoria Climbié, another child who was failed by the system. ContactPoint was designed to streamline information sharing and improve child protection. However, it was dismantled in 2010 due to political decisions, leaving a significant gap in the system.
Critics of the decision to scrap ContactPoint, such as Tony Clamp, who worked on its development, argue that this move left children like Sara more vulnerable. The destruction of the system not only wasted years of work and resources but also removed a crucial tool for safeguarding children. Clamp has called for accountability from those who decided to dismantle the program, including political leaders who prioritized cost-cutting over child safety. This decision is now seen as a missed opportunity to strengthen the child protection framework.

Failures in Protecting Sara Sharif: A Tragic Reality
The family court system has also come under scrutiny in the wake of Sara’s death. Judges, who ultimately decide custody arrangements, often operate under the assumption that maintaining contact with birth relatives is in the child’s best interests. However, this assumption can be dangerously flawed. In Sara’s case, custody was granted to her father, who, along with her stepmother, was later responsible for her death. Diane Johnson, a retired child protection social worker, points out that children are statistically more at risk when living with step-parents. She emphasizes the need for judges to consider the full context of each case and for greater collaboration between police and social workers in investigating abuse.
Beyond systemic failures, Sara’s death raises broader questions about how society values child protection work. Social workers and other frontline professionals often operate in challenging conditions, with limited resources and heavy caseloads. Despite their critical role, they are frequently vilified when tragedies occur. This creates a culture of fear and blame, which can deter talented individuals from entering or staying in the profession. Addressing these issues requires a cultural shift, where child protection work is properly funded and supported.
Following the death of Victoria Climbié, significant reforms were introduced, including the establishment of children’s services departments that combined education and social care functions. However, these structural changes came at a high cost. Local authorities had to create new director roles and offer higher salaries to attract qualified candidates. While these changes were intended to improve collaboration and accountability, they also diverted resources away from frontline services. John Surowiec, a retired deputy director of children’s services, argues that the funds spent on restructuring could have been better used to hire more social workers and improve their pay. This would have had a more direct impact on protecting children like Sara.
The recurring failures in the child protection system are a painful reminder that safeguarding children is a collective responsibility. Governments, courts, and professionals all have a role to play, but so does society as a whole. Ensuring the safety of vulnerable children requires sustained commitment, adequate resources, and a willingness to learn from past mistakes. While Sara’s death has prompted fresh calls for reform, many remain skeptical about whether meaningful change will follow. Too often, promises of “never again” have turned out to be hollow. If there is to be any hope of breaking this cycle, the focus must be on action rather than rhetoric.
Sara’s story is a heartbreaking testament to the consequences of systemic failures and societal neglect. Her death should not be in vain. To honor her memory, we must address the root causes of these tragedies and work tirelessly to create a system that truly prioritizes the well-being of children. Only then can we hope to prevent such devastating losses in the future.
NEWS
Shannon Sharpe’s Wild Sky Bri Comment Goes Viral Amid $50M Assault Lawsuit: “She Played On Her Back!

Shannon Sharpe is under fire in 2025, and it has nothing to do with his NFL career or infectious sportscasting personality. Two unconnected controversies have combined to catapult him into the public eye in a manner few ever would have imagined. On one front he has gone viral for saying something brash and provocative about the adult content creator Sky Bri on his podcast. On the other, he’s contending with a $50 million civil lawsuit over serious allegations of sexual misconduct. All this has made for headlines, online arguments and reputational hit jobs galore.
The first incident occurred during a recent episode of Nightcap, Sharpe’s podcast that he co-hosts with former NFL star Chad “Ochocinco” Johnson. When chatting about OnlyFans personality Sky Bri, Sharpe said something that took off and went viral. “She played on her back!” he said of her adult film work. The clip went viral on Twitter, TikTok and Instagram, where it was viewed millions of times. The internet responded with a combination of surprise, humor and anger. Some called Sharpe out for being disrespectful to sex workers and to those with such illnesses, while others pointed to the comment as part of Sharpe’s unfiltered act.
The backlash then led to a surge of response from pop culture commentators and influencers. There was widespread skepticism that Sharpe’s developing online personality had ventured too far from the credibility he accrued as a sports commentator. Famed for his pithy punditry and larger-than-life charisma, Sharpe is now being seen by some as edging ever closer to the territory of internet shock jock in saleable search for clicks. Commentators like DJ Akademiks and Kevin “No Chill” Morris, a YouTube critic, have suggested that Sharpe is stuck between the reality that made him and the circus of new media.
While social media users were busy debating the Sky Bri moment, a much more serious issue emerged. “Jane Doe,” a woman claiming to reside in California, sued Sharpe for sexual assault, battery, false imprisonment, and emotional distress. The lawsuit, which was submitted by high-profile attorney Tony Buzbee – who also represented clients in several high-profile sexual misconduct cases, demands more than 50 million dollars in compensation. Through his lawyer Lanny Davis, Sharpe unequivocally denied the claims, arguing that everything that transpired was consensual, and the meeting involved complicated role-play.
However, in a surprising turn of events, it was revealed that two weeks before filing the lawsuit, Jane Doe was offered a 10 million settlement, which she turned down: Sharpe plans to also file a lawsuit for defamation, arguing that this exchange was orchestrated to undermine his credibility. Upon filing the lawsuit, the plaintiff’s legal team released audio material, where Sharpe is heard yelling aggressively and threateningly. Davis claims that this material is removed from context and was recorded during an eventful role-play without consent.
“Labeling it assault is inaccurate, unethical, and perverse,” the lawyer said. This scandal is far from the first one involving Sharpe’s personal affairs. In the second half of 2024, a pornographic live video appeared on his personal Instagram account by accident. The clip with an explicit audio of Sharpe having intimate relations was viewed by tens of thousands of people before being removed. At that time, Sharpe claimed that his account was hacked. However, he later confessed on his podcast that it was him accidentally pressing the live button.
The series of controversies has raised concern at ESPN, where Sharpe currently serves as co-host of First Take. Formal action has not yet been taken, but insiders believe network executives are closely watching the situation. Sharpe, with his high-profile platform and millions of viewers, finds his behavior under the microscope in a way it never has been.
As these events unfold, the public gets to see how Sharpe not only is traveling through a period that could redefine his post-football legacy, but also begins to come to full understanding of Grantham and the life he helped save. Will his unvarnished, sometimes incendiary, delivery continue to resonate with audiences or will the crushing reality of legal woes and blowback shift the course of his media career? Whether this is a storm that passes over or the beginning of a longer unraveling, one thing is for sure: Shannon Sharpe is one of the most divisive sports and entertainment characters of Twentieth Year of The Millennium.
NEWS
Butler, Curry lead Warriors past Grizzlies, into playoffs

Jimmy Butler III and Stephen Curry responded by trying to shoot the Golden State Warriors into the playoffs, and they succeeded on Tuesday night, beating the Memphis Grizzlies, 121-116, and earning the seventh seed in the long and winding Western Conference postseason bracketing. The victory, part of the N.B.A. play-in tournament, means the Warriors will face the Houston Rockets in a best-of-seven first-round series beginning Sunday.
Butler had a monster game with 38 points, seven rebounds and six assists. A player with a reputation for clutch performances in high stakes games, “Playoff Jimmy” lived up to his moniker, making impactful plays at both ends of the floor. His energy helped relieve some pressure on Curry, who also had a huge night, scoring 37 points. Curry hit crucial shots late, including a baseline three-pointer with under two minutes to play, and another from the left wing with one minute remaining. He then added two important free throws with 5.4 seconds remaining to seal the victory.
The Grizzlies had one last opportunity to tie the game, but Santi Aldama failed to get the ball inbounds in time, resulting in a five-second violation that ended Memphis’s chances. Desmond Bane scored 30 points for Memphis, while Ja Morant added 22. The Grizzlies advance to face the winner of the Mavericks-Kings matchup for the final West playoff spot.
But the Golden State victory was not buoyed merely by star power, but solid team play. Butler turned in one of his best games since joining the Warriors at the trade deadline, making 12 of 20 shots and 12 of 18 free throws. It was his second straight game with 30 or more points and his highest output with the team. His aggressive play, particularly in important stretches, kept the Warriors in control even as Memphis mounted multiple runs.
Butler brought it back Golden State’s way with a steal and a dunk as Memphis started to hit its stride in the third quarter. Morant gave the Grizzlies a scare when he rolled his right ankle after stepping on Buddy Hield’s foot. In spite of the injury, he converted a three-point play that cut Memphis to within one point for a spell. Jaren Jackson Jr. had 18 points, while Zach Edey had 14 points and 17 rebounds. Edey hit two clutch free throws with 14.3 seconds left, but that wasn’t enough to change the course of the game.
Curry had it worse than his 52-point explosion against the Grizzlies’ defense earlier in the month. He went 9-for-22 from the field while enduring ongoing defensive pressure, especially from Scotty Pippen Jr., who fouled out. Curry never lost his nerve and he also never wavered in the game fixture when it still counted. He also collected eight rebounds and added four assists.
The game included numerous strong opening quarter by the Warriors highlighted by a run aided and abetted by Butler. He participated in four consecutive scoring plays, beginning with an assist to Gary Payton II for a backdoor dunk, followed by an alley-oop to Quinten Post for a three, and then a three-point basket and a traditional three-point play. Butler did not appear to be dealing with pain from the quadriceps injury he suffered in the Warriors’ previous game against the Clippers.
This victory meant that Golden State, a team that previously had never won a series in the play-in tournament before Tuesday, would take on the Memphis Grizzlies in an elimination game for the eighth and final playoff spot. Their seasons came to an end in both 2021 and 2024 during play-in games, including a gut-wrenching overtime defeat by Memphis at Chase Center in 2021. That history provided extra motivation for some veterans like Curry and Draymond Green, who were eager to not experience an early exit again.
The Warriors had wanted to avoid the play-in tournament entirely but that idea went out the window when they dropped their last regular-season game in overtime to the Clippers. That loss was their third at home in the final week of the season, and it also left their playoff path uncertain. But with this victory, they’ve secured their spot and now turn their attention to the coming series against Houston.
Golden State’s play indicates they are peaking at the right time. With Butler playing as well as he is next to Curry, they have a real dynamic duo to ride into the playoffs. Their resilience, chemistry and collective playoff experience could make them a dangerous foe for any team in the West.
NEWS
When are taxes due? Here’s the last day to file, how to file an extension before Tuesday

And if you haven’t filed your taxes for 2025 yet, you’re cutting it close. Tax Day is fast approaching, and if you don’t know the status of your refund — or if you’ll get one — now’s the time to find out. With the deadline approaching, there’s a lot to know about the key dates, how to ask for extra time if you need it and how long you could wait for a refund, according to the Internal Revenue Service, which anticipates that nearly 140 million Americans will file taxes in 2023.
Your taxes are due on Tuesday, April 15, 2025. When April 15 falls on a weekend or legal holiday, the deadline carries over to the following business day.” The deadline is extended to June 16, 2025, for Americans overseas. The timing matters, whether you’re filing electronically or mailing your return. For electronic submissions, your time zone and the date and time of your submission are what the IRS relies on to decide whether your return was timely filed. If you’re mailing a paper return, it must be properly addressed, postage must be paid, and the return must be postmarked on or before the due date.
If you are not quite ready to file by the deadline, the IRS has several options for requesting an extension. One is to file online for an automatic extension, using IRS Free File, which is open to everyone, no matter their income. Then there’s the traditional method of sending in Form 4868 — the Application for Automatic Extension of Time to File. You can also submit it via IRS e-filing partners or with assistance from a tax pro. When completing this form, estimate what you owe in taxes and then subtract any payments you made over the course of the year. Third, you can pay your estimated tax due online using one of the IRS payment options and check the box you are filing for an extension. This approach means you don’t have to file a separate extension form — and you’ll receive a confirmation number showing that the extension was granted.
There’s some good news for those living outside the United States: if you are a U.S. citizen or resident alien living abroad as of the original tax filing deadline, you’re entitled to an automatic two-month extension without filing anything.
Once you file your taxes, you’ll likely be wondering when your refund will arrive. The “ Where’s My Refund? tool. To access it, you’ll need your Social Security number or individual taxpayer ID number, your filing status and the exact refund amount on your return. Once you enter the information, the system will tell you if it received your return, if your refund has been approved or if it has been sent. When your refund is issued, it can take up to five days to appear in your bank account, or several weeks if you’re waiting for a check in the mail.
For the most part, the IRS issues refunds in a reasonably timely manner — most of them in less than three weeks if you filed electronically. But they warn taxpayers not to count on receiving their refunds by any date, particular if the funds are intended for either a large purchase or an important payment to make. If additional review is required, some returns may take longer to process.
There are a number of reasons your refund might be delayed. The IRS says common reasons for such letters include an error or missing information on the return, complications arising from identity theft or fraud, or certain adjustments to the child tax credit or the recovery rebate credit. Delays may also affect taxpayers who file for the earned income tax credit or the additional child tax credit in some cases. If you filed Form 8379 — called the Injured Spouse Allocation — the review process will likely take longer, too. And even once the IRS sends your refund, it can take a few extra days depending on how your bank or credit union processes everything.
Filing your taxes doesn’t need to be stressful, but with the deadline looming, you should definitely not wait until the last minute. Whether you need more time or only you’re just waiting for your refund, figuring out how the process works and acting correctly now can help prevent you from pulling your hair out later.
-
Celebrity11 months ago
Relationship Lessons from Jennifer Lopez and Ben Affleck
-
Entertainment1 year ago
Zendaya Opens Up About Racy Scenes and Family Reactions in New Film
-
Health Care1 year ago
Pink Eye(Conjunctivitis): What Is Commonly MISDIAGNOSED As PINK EYE?
-
Entertainment1 year ago
Zendaya and Tom Holland kiss at The London Challengers premiere.
-
Health Care1 year ago
WHO Scientist Urges Monitoring & Prep For Highly Pathogenic Bird Flu
-
NEWS1 year ago
Is Trump Going To Jail? Your Questions About Trump’s Trial Answered
-
Entertainment1 year ago
Chris Martin and Dakota Johnson reportedly got engaged years ago
-
Blog1 year ago
Google’s Layoffs Amid Record Profits: A Glimpse into AI’s Impact on the Workforce