Neil Gaiman Accused Eight Women Share Their Stories

Numerous charges of rape have been made against celebrated creator Neil Gaiman, well referred to for works like The Sandman and Coraline. These charges surfaced noticeably in a new main story by New York Magazine, where eight ladies shared their records, a few of which cross-over with past cases uncovered in a webcast by Turtle Media prior in 2024.

The New York Magazine article, named “There Is No Protected Word,” portrays Gaiman’s collaborations with the informers. The story expands upon beginning detailing from Turtle Media’s six-section digital broadcast, Expert, which initially uncovered charges including five ladies. While a portion of the informers in the digital broadcast utilized pen names safeguard their characters, the New York Magazine piece incorporates nitty gritty declarations from eight ladies, four of whom likewise took part in the web recording.

One of the ladies, Scarlett Pavlovich, described her most memorable gathering with Gaiman, worked with through his previous spouse, Amanda Palmer. Pavlovich expressed that she at first started up a relationship with Palmer in New Zealand and was subsequently asked to watch the couple’s kid. Pavlovich guaranteed that during one of her initial experiences with Gaiman, he welcomed her to scrub down in a paw foot tub in his nursery, during which he joined her exposed and supposedly physically attacked her. She depicted how he crossed different limits, endeavoring a few non-consensual demonstrations, including unseemly actual contact and sexual demonstrations in spite of her unequivocal refusals.

Pavlovich further claimed that this conduct endured over the course of her experience as a sitter, including one example where Gaiman purportedly endeavored to involve margarine as an ointment during a rape. She likewise reviewed how he constrained her to perform corrupting demonstrations assuming some pretense of consensual BDSM, regardless of there being no earlier understanding or unequivocal assent for such way of behaving. She described being alluded to as “slave” and constrained to satisfy belittling solicitations.

When gone after remark, Gaiman’s agents guarded his way of behaving as legitimate inside the setting of consensual BDSM exercises yet unequivocally denied any non-consensual activities. They kept up with that the informers had, at certain places, took part energetically in specific connections. Notwithstanding, Pavlovich demanded that any similarity to assent was constrained, frequently under coercion or during snapshots of shock and disarray.

Another upsetting record itemized an episode in a lodging in Auckland. Pavlovich claimed that Neil Gaiman started a sexual experience with her while his child was available in the room. She depicted being in a condition of skepticism and shock, scrutinizing his activities as they unfurled. Gaiman’s agents have completely denied this particular allegation, naming it as both “misleading” and “vile.”

The New York Magazine report additionally uncovers that Pavlovich kept speaking with Gaiman for quite a while after the episodes, during which she purportedly consoled him that their connections had been consensual. Notwithstanding, she at last recorded a police report blaming him for rape. Notwithstanding her endeavors, the case has since been shut, with police declining to seek after additional examination.

Another informer, distinguished as Caroline, talked about her encounters while functioning as a guardian and sitter on Gaiman’s property in Woodstock, New York. She asserted that the relationship turned actual after her better half left her in 2017. Caroline described an especially nerve racking occurrence where Gaiman supposedly put her hand on his private parts while they were sleeping with his youngster. She portrayed feeling profoundly upset by his absence of limits. In the long run, Caroline acknowledged a $300,000 settlement in return for consenting to a non-revelation arrangement and leaving the property. Gaiman’s agents denied any sexual action including Caroline within the sight of his kid and asserted that she started their experiences.

Among different informers is Kendra Strong, who met Gaiman at a book marking in Florida when she was 18. She asserted that their relationship turned actual three years after the fact. In one case, during an outing to Cornwall in 2007, she guaranteed that Gaiman assaulted her regardless of her rehashed refusals, refering to a urinary parcel disease as a justification behind her absence of assent. She recorded a police report against him in October 2024.

Another lady, Katherine Kendall, affirmed that Gaiman endeavored to attack her on his visit transport in 2012 after she had obviously expressed she would have rather not engaged in sexual relations with him. Years after the fact, he supposedly offered her $60,000 for treatment, purportedly to “compensate for the harm” brought about by his activities.

Since the distribution of these claims, Gaiman has confronted critical expert repercussions. Amazon’s Promising signs Season 3, recently set to be a full series, will presently finish up with a solitary hour and a half episode, with Gaiman eliminated from creation. Disney has stopped advancement on its transformation of The Memorial park Book, and Netflix has dropped Dead Kid Analysts, despite the fact that it stays muddled assuming this choice is straightforwardly connected with the claims. Nonetheless, a portion of Gaiman’s undertakings, including The Sandman Season 2 on Netflix and the impending variation of Anansi Young men on Amazon Prime Video, stay on target.

Regardless of the charges, Gaiman has kept on denying any bad behavior. He has reliably attested that all collaborations were consensual and has highlighted examples where a few informers supposedly insisted this. His delegates have likewise featured the monetary repayments came to with a portion of the ladies, inferring a shared consent to determine questions.

The narratives introduced in the New York Magazine piece have touched off far and wide discussions about the elements of force, assent, and responsibility in imaginative businesses. While some have lauded the fortitude of the ones who have approached, others stay careful about condemning until more substantial proof arises.

As the aftermath from these claims proceeds, the diversion world and Gaiman’s fanbase wrestle with the ramifications of these disclosures, leaving an inheritance once praised for its inventiveness and creative mind currently blurred by contention.