Connect with us

NEWS

Is Trump Going To Jail? Your Questions About Trump’s Trial Answered

Published

on

trump trail, is trump going to jail?
Reading Time: 4 minutes

When CNN asked for your questions about former President Donald Trump’s upcoming first criminal trial – for his role in hush money payments made before the 2016 election to women who said they had affairs with him – we got a flood of input.

Not all of it was fit to print, is trump going to jail? But there were a lot of legitimate and very thoughtful questions. Keep reading for a representative sampling, which helps explain the case. Most of the questions come directly from reader submissions, but for others, I’ve simplified multiple submissions into one question. Trump, by the way, denies having the affairs and has pleaded not guilty in the case.

Trump Criminal Trial

Is Trump going to jail Or Not?

I went to CNN’s chief legal analyst Laura Coates for the single, most-asked question, which was asked in many ways but boiled down to: will trump go to jail?

Coates: If Trump were to be found guilty of all of the counts, he could theoretically be facing more than a decade in prison. The 34 felony counts are classified as Class E felonies in New York, the lowest level felony in the state.

Another possibility is that the judge could forgo prison entirely and place him on probation with the possibility of incarceration looming over his head if he fails to abide by the conditions set by the judge. If the judge decides to incarcerate post-conviction, the Secret Service would become the elephant in the, well, cell. The unprecedented nature of incarcerating a former president would raise questions about how best to ensure equal treatment under the law and security for a former president.

If Trump were sent to prison, would he still have his presidential Secret Service protecting him in jail?

I reached out to the Secret Service to ask if they had planned for the potential that Trump could be imprisoned. Not surprisingly, I was told by a spokesman that this is “something we can not comment on at this time.” But note that as a matter of US law, former presidents and their spouses are afforded lifetime Secret Service protection, unless they decline it. Some more trump news today cnn.

Will the trial be televised?

No. While many states frequently broadcast trials, New York state civil rights law limits what is allowed. The judge, Juan Merchan, could in theory make an exception, but he did not allow cameras to broadcast trump legal news arraignment last year.

It is possible that photos and video inside the courtroom may be taken prior to proceedings, as occurred during his New York civil fraud trial.

Former President Donald Trump sits in the courtroom with attorneys Christopher Kise and Alina Habba.

Similarly, if or when his federal trials on charges of election interference and mishandling classified data occur, there are rules that likely bar the broadcast of those as well. His trial in Georgia on charges of election interference would be televised if it occurs.

Does Trump have to be in court every day?

Yes. The judicial process is built around the idea that defendants are there to answer charges, and New York law requires that a defendant be present at trial.

There are a few exceptions. Trump could ask to be excused and waive his right to be present, but the prosecution could object. Disorderly or disruptive defendants can also be removed from court during their trial.

Could he be president from prison?

This is a great and essentially unanswerable hypothetical. First, it assumes multiple things will occur: Trump would have to be convicted, sentenced, exhaust appeals, report to prison and win the election. That’s a very specific scenario thrust upon a very unpredictable set of circumstances and a short timeline. But here we go.

 Former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks as he leaves the courtroom during his civil fraud trial at New York Supreme Court

I talked to Frank Bowman, a law professor emeritus at the University of Missouri who is both an expert in criminal law and published a book on the impeachment process, for his thoughts on how to deal with a convict president. The Constitution, he said, theoretically allows a person to serve “even if he’s a convicted felon or even if he’s a convicted felon in the joint.”

Trump quotes, however, would get in the way of this hypothetical ever occurring. “This stuff takes a long time, and the appeals would drag out,” probably beyond Election Day and Inauguration Day, Bowman said.

It’s also possible Trump’s opponents, after a conviction, could try again to either impeach him or object to his presidency based on the 14th Amendment, although those avenues have been tried and failed previously.

If somehow Trump was convicted in this state case, Bowman imagined there could be some argument by which the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause – which prohibits states from interfering in the exercise of constitutional powers – could be utilized to keep Trump rally from state prison. But it would be a novel thing.

Donald trump trail on court

If, on the other hand, Trump was somehow convicted in one of his two federal trials and sentenced to federal prison, as president he could theoretically try to pardon himself or order the Bureau of Prisons to do something like confine him at the White House. Again, this is uncharted territory that is unanticipated in US law and,Bowman argues,unlikely to occur.

NEWS

Today’s NYT Mini Crossword Hints and Solutions Revealed

Published

on

Today’s NYT Mini Crossword Answers and Tips.

Reading Time: 4 minutesThe New York Times Mini Crossword offers a fun, quick, and accessible daily puzzle, ideal for busy individuals or anyone needing a short mental break. On October 31, the Mini Crossword provides a playful set of clues that vary in difficulty, allowing it to be solved in just a few minutes. Known for being a smaller, quicker alternative to the full NYT Crossword, the Mini has gained popularity among both seasoned puzzlers and newcomers looking for a manageable challenge.

The October 31st puzzle brings a hint of Halloween spirit with clues that subtly nod to the holiday. Clues like “Halloween costume with a cardboard box and aluminum foil” add a seasonal flair, making the puzzle more engaging for solvers. For those who enjoy puzzles but lack the time for a full NYT Crossword, the Mini offers the perfect alternative. This bite-sized puzzle can often be completed in under five minutes, making it ideal for a short break in a busy day.

Today’s NYT Mini Crossword Answers and Tips

Today’s NYT Mini Crossword Answers and Tips

The Mini Crossword was created to offer a more approachable crossword experience. While the full NYT Crossword Puzzle may require broad knowledge and be time-consuming, the Mini is designed to be simpler and more accessible. With straightforward vocabulary and familiar clues, many people can solve the Mini without needing to look up answers. Available daily online and free to play, it provides non-subscribers a taste of the NYT’s famous puzzle section. For those who enjoy the Mini and want more challenges, a subscription to the New York Times Games section gives access to archived Mini Crosswords, plus other popular games like Wordle and Spelling Bee.

The first clue in today’s Mini Crossword, “Hybrid equine animal with stripes,” leads to the answer “ZORSE,” a cross between a zebra and a horse. This type of unique term is a staple of the Mini Crossword, bringing a touch of trivia that puzzle fans enjoy. Another clue, “Fingers crossed!” with the answer “IHOPE,” reflects the Mini’s light-hearted style, making it approachable and fun for all solvers. Unlike the full NYT Crossword, which may include more formal and challenging clues, the Mini has a casual tone that appeals to a broad audience.

The down clues in today’s puzzle also capture the Mini’s playful essence. “Zippo, nada, nothin’” has the answer “ZILCH,” a colloquial term for nothing. This sort of everyday language is common in crosswords, providing moments of recognition and relatability. Another down clue, “Catherine of ‘Beetlejuice,’” answers “OHARA,” a nod to actress Catherine O’Hara and a favorite for Halloween fans. Pop culture references like these make the Mini Crossword feel both current and nostalgic, resonating with solvers who enjoy little cultural nods.

The Mini Crossword is just one of the many games available in the New York Times Games section, which also features Wordle, Spelling Bee, and Sudoku. While the Mini Crossword is relatively easy, other games in the section offer adjustable difficulty levels, allowing players to pick something that fits their mood or skill level. The variety has made the Times’ Games section a popular online destination for people looking to relax and engage their minds.

Crosswords, even small ones like the Mini, provide cognitive benefits. Research suggests that regular puzzle-solving can improve memory, expand vocabulary, and stimulate the brain in ways that may help to prevent cognitive decline. Completing a daily Mini Crossword offers a quick mental workout without the large time commitment of a bigger puzzle. This makes the Mini an appealing addition to daily routines, providing a manageable yet challenging activity that exercises the brain in meaningful ways.

Solving today’s Mini Crossword brings a sense of satisfaction familiar to any crossword lover. Filling in each answer and watching the grid fill up is a small but rewarding accomplishment. Unlike the full-sized NYT Crossword, which can take a dedicated hour or more to finish, the Mini is designed for completion in just a few minutes, creating a satisfying moment in the day. This makes the Mini ideal for busy people, students, and anyone who enjoys the sense of satisfaction that comes with solving a puzzle but may not have time for a long session.

The NYT Mini Crossword’s short length and approachable difficulty make it popular with a wide range of players, from avid crossword enthusiasts to people who are new to puzzles. Each puzzle provides an opportunity to think outside the box, learn new words, and discover interesting trivia. Today’s October 31 puzzle includes a few Halloween-themed clues but is ultimately designed to appeal to diverse interests and backgrounds, making it a puzzle that anyone can enjoy.

Today’s puzzle, like all Mini Crosswords, highlights how enjoyable it is to solve a well-crafted, accessible puzzle. Though small, the Mini Crossword has developed a loyal following among those who love crosswords, word games, and anyone who enjoys a brief but engaging mental challenge. Whether you’re a long-time puzzle solver or a newcomer, the Mini Crossword is a daily treat that brings the fun of puzzle-solving to anyone with a few minutes to spare.

Continue Reading

NEWS

Top Food Poisoning Lawyers Near You – Get Compensation Now

Published

on

Food Poisoning Incident: 46 Hospitalized in Jessup, MD

Reading Time: 3 minutesA food poisoning incident in Jessup, Maryland, led to 46 people being hospitalized on Monday, according to officials. The Maryland Department of Health is currently investigating the case, which appears to be an isolated and unintentional event. The affected individuals were connected to NAFCO Wholesale Seafood Distributors, though it is believed that the contaminated food was not part of NAFCO’s usual operations.

All 46 individuals were taken to local hospitals after experiencing symptoms of food poisoning. Fortunately, all of them have been reported to be in stable condition. Despite the sudden onset of illness, health officials have stated that there is no ongoing concern for the public. The cause of the contamination is still being investigated, and the health department is actively working to pinpoint exactly what caused the outbreak.

Dr. Clifford Mitchell, a key figure from the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, emphasized the importance of obtaining both food and biological samples to determine the source of the contamination. “If we can get samples of the food itself and test it in our laboratory, we will also examine specimens from individuals who sought medical care to identify the causal agent or agents,” Dr. Mitchell said.

Early reports suggest that the contamination was caused by a noodle dish brought in by one of the workers to share with colleagues. Within an hour of consuming the meal, several people began to feel sick, leading to concerns of a potential foodborne illness. While NAFCO was involved due to the location where the individuals became ill, officials are confident that the contamination did not originate from the company’s seafood products. The Maryland Department of Health has been clear in stating that NAFCO is not at fault for the contamination, and their investigation continues to focus on the outside food.

Stanley Pearlman Enterprises, the parent company of NAFCO, issued a statement on Tuesday addressing the incident. In their statement, the company stressed that the contaminated food did not come from their facilities. NAFCO operates under strict health and safety standards, and their headquarters and operations are routinely inspected by health authorities to ensure compliance with all relevant safety regulations. The company also reiterated its commitment to providing safe, high-quality seafood products and reassured the public that NAFCO follows rigorous safety procedures.

The Maryland Department of Health has also reassured the public that this appears to be an isolated event with no broader implications. While food poisoning can often spread in cases involving contaminated products from restaurants or suppliers, this case seems to have originated from a single dish prepared and brought in by an individual for personal consumption. The health department is not expecting further cases related to this incident and continues to monitor the situation closely.

One of the challenges in determining the cause of foodborne illnesses, according to Dr. Mitchell, is that not all cases are caused by a single pathogen. Food poisoning can be triggered by bacteria, viruses, or even toxins produced by certain pathogens, which complicates efforts to identify the specific cause. “It’s not just pathogens that are always involved,” Dr. Mitchell explained. “Sometimes it’s a combination of bacteria or a virus. Some pathogens produce chemicals or toxins that cause a faster reaction. Our investigation will cover all possibilities.”

This incident highlights the importance of food safety, especially in environments where food is shared among coworkers or groups. Dr. Mitchell emphasized the need for strict food safety practices when preparing, handling, and storing food. In this case, improper food handling may have played a role in causing the foodborne illness. “Most of these incidents involve people who aren’t trying to make others sick but simply aren’t following basic food safety rules,” Mitchell said. “We want to emphasize that hot foods need to stay hot, and cold foods need to stay cold. Even well-meaning gestures like bringing in homemade food can pose risks if proper safety practices aren’t followed.”

Food safety guidelines from health authorities encourage people to be particularly vigilant when preparing meals for large groups. Whether bringing food to the office or preparing meals for an event, it’s crucial to ensure that food is cooked to the appropriate temperatures and stored safely to avoid contamination. In addition, it’s important to avoid cross-contamination, ensure cleanliness during food preparation, and promptly refrigerate leftovers. Simple practices like these can make a big difference in preventing foodborne illnesses.

The investigation is ongoing, and health officials are working to identify the exact cause of the contamination. Results from lab tests on food samples and specimens from those affected will help determine which specific pathogen or toxin was responsible. The Maryland Department of Health will release further information as it becomes available, but they have already reassured the public that there is no current risk of further exposure from this incident.

As the investigation continues, the health department will also use this incident as an opportunity to remind people of the importance of food safety. While it’s always thoughtful to share homemade food, it’s essential to follow proper guidelines to prevent any unintended harm.

Continue Reading

NEWS

Breanna Stewart’s Family Threatened After WNBA Finals Loss: Anti-Gay Email Sparks Outrage

Published

on

Breanna Stewart's

Reading Time: 3 minutesBreanna Stewart, the two-time WNBA MVP, revealed a shocking and disturbing incident following the New York Liberty’s loss to the Minnesota Lynx in Game 1 of the WNBA Finals. Stewart’s wife, Marta Xargay Casademont, received a threatening anti-gay email, prompting immediate concern and action from the Liberty, the league, and law enforcement.

The email, which contained both threats and homophobic language, came after a tense game where Stewart missed a free throw that could have given the Liberty the lead in the final seconds of regulation and later missed a layup in overtime that would have tied the game. The defeat left New York trailing in the series and added to the emotional toll the Stewart family was already facing.

Speaking to reporters, Stewart expressed her concern for her wife and their children, Ruby and Theo. “For Marta, especially, it was terrifying,” Stewart said. “There’s another level of invasion happening there.” The email served as a stark reminder of the challenges Stewart and other LGBTQ+ athletes face, both on and off the court.

Stewart and Xargay Casademont have been taking precautions since the incident, with Stewart confirming that the situation has been reported to the Liberty, the league, and law enforcement. While Stewart assured the public that her family is “doing OK,” the emotional and psychological impact of the threats cannot be understated. “We just want to make sure, obviously, myself and Marta are OK, but our kids are the ones that are the safest,” Stewart added.

The incident has raised broader questions about the treatment of athletes, particularly women and LGBTQ+ players, who have been facing increasing harassment this season. In addition to Stewart, players like DiJonai Carrington and Angel Reese have also shared their experiences with hateful, racist, and homophobic messages, underlining a growing problem within sports, especially with the WNBA’s increasing popularity.

The WNBA and the New York Liberty quickly responded to the situation. A spokesperson for the league condemned the threats and affirmed that steps are being taken to protect the players. “There is absolutely no room for hateful or threatening comments directed at our players or anyone affiliated with the league,” the spokesperson said. The league is working closely with law enforcement and security teams to ensure the safety of Stewart and other players, and is also reviewing protocols to prevent such incidents in the future.

Commissioner Cathy Engelbert also addressed the matter, calling the threats troubling and highlighting the need for the league to enhance security measures. She assured that the league would continue to work on improving player safety through technology, mental health support, and increased monitoring.

Despite the heightened attention to harassment and threats, Stewart remains hopeful that change is possible. “We love that people are engaged in our sport, but not to the point where there’s threats or harassment,” Stewart said, calling on the public to take a stand against hate and discrimination.

As the Liberty prepare for the next game in the Finals, Stewart and her family continue to navigate the emotional fallout from the incident. But the focus is also on broader issues within the sport and society, as the rise in harassment highlights the urgent need for greater accountability and better protective measures for athletes, especially those in the LGBTQ+ community.

The disturbing email not only sheds light on the challenges Stewart faces but also serves as a call for action across all sports. It’s a reminder that while athletes should be celebrated for their talent and achievements, they must also be safeguarded from the hateful rhetoric that too often infiltrates the world of professional sports.

As the series progresses, the Liberty and the WNBA have promised to take stronger steps to protect their players and ensure that no athlete has to face such threats in the future. For Stewart and her family, the priority remains the safety and well-being of their children and loved ones. However, the incident also serves as a reminder that more must be done to combat hate and discrimination in sports.

Continue Reading

Trending